Direct vs Indirect Spend Analysis What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

Direct vs Indirect Spend Analysis: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

Introduction

In the fast-paced world of business, every decision counts, and every dollar matters. This is where the discipline of spend analysis comes into play. Spend analysis is the process of collecting, cleansing, classifying, and analyzing expenditure data with the purpose of reducing procurement costs, improving efficiency, and monitoring compliance. It’s a strategic pillar that underpins effective procurement and sourcing, providing an insightful lens through which organizations can view their spending patterns.

Spend analysis plays a vital role in procurement and strategic sourcing. It’s more than just knowing where the money goes; it’s about understanding the patterns, recognizing the opportunities for consolidation, and identifying the areas where procurement can negotiate better terms. By harnessing this data-driven insight, organizations can make strategic decisions that enhance operational efficiency, drive cost savings, and ultimately, deliver a competitive advantage.

In the realm of spend analysis, two terms often come to the fore: “direct spend” and “indirect spend”. These categories divide organizational expenditure into two broad camps, each with its unique characteristics, challenges, and opportunities. Understanding these terms is fundamental to unraveling the intricacies of spend management and leveraging the full potential of spend analysis.

In the journey that follows, we’ll delve into the nuances of direct and indirect spending, explore their differences, and illuminate why distinguishing between the two is not only important but instrumental in effective procurement strategy. So, whether you’re a seasoned procurement professional or a newcomer to the field, there’s something to discover and learn as we embark on this explorative discourse. Stay tuned!

Section 1: Understanding Direct Spend

Direct spending, as the name suggests, refers to the expenses directly associated with the production of goods or services that a company offers. These are the costs without which the creation of a product or service would simply be impossible. For instance, if you’re a car manufacturer, your direct spending would encompass the costs of materials like steel, rubber, and glass, which are integral to the production of vehicles. Similarly, a restaurant’s direct spending would include the cost of raw ingredients used to prepare the dishes on its menu.

These expenses are at the heart of a company’s operations, directly contributing to the core products or services it offers. They are often seen as the “cost of doing business”. Without these expenditures, production would halt, services would cease, and the company would be unable to fulfill its fundamental business purpose.

Spend analysis plays a crucial role in managing direct spending. By systematically analyzing direct spending data, organizations can identify trends, spot inefficiencies, and uncover opportunities for cost savings. This might involve negotiating better pricing with suppliers, consolidating purchases to take advantage of volume discounts, or switching to alternative materials or suppliers that offer better value for money.

Let’s take the example of one of our clients, a leading manufacturer in the consumer electronics industry. They were grappling with escalating costs of key components, which were eating into their profit margins. With the help of EmpoweringCPO’s spend analysis services, they were able to dissect their direct spending in granular detail. Our analysis revealed that they were sourcing similar components from multiple suppliers at varying prices. Armed with this insight, the company was able to consolidate its purchases and negotiate better prices with a single supplier, leading to significant cost savings and improved supplier relationship management. This instance showcases the potential of effective direct spend analysis in driving operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

In essence, understanding and managing direct spending is no easy task, but with diligent spend analysis, businesses can navigate this complex landscape more effectively. By making informed, data-driven decisions, they can optimize their direct spending and enhance their bottom line, all while ensuring the uninterrupted production of their core offerings.

Section 2: Understanding Indirect Spend

In contrast to direct spend, indirect spending refers to the expenses that are not directly linked to the production of a company’s goods or services, but are nonetheless vital for its operations. These costs cover a wide range of goods and services that support the organization’s functioning, such as office supplies, utilities, IT services, marketing expenses, and professional services.

While indirect spending may not contribute to a company’s products or services in the same way as direct spending, it significantly impacts a company’s operations and bottom line. These costs are essential for maintaining the infrastructure and environment that enable a company to operate effectively. For instance, without IT support, employees may not be able to perform their tasks efficiently. Without utilities like electricity and water, an office cannot function. So, while these costs may seem peripheral, they are fundamental to a company’s operational success and financial health.

Managing and analyzing indirect spending presents its own set of unique challenges. The broad range of categories and suppliers involved in indirect spending can make it difficult to track and control. It’s not uncommon for different departments or business units within an organization to independently manage their own indirect spending, leading to a lack of visibility and control at the organizational level. Additionally, because indirect spending is often viewed as non-strategic or less important, it may not receive the same level of scrutiny or strategic focus as direct spending.

However, with effective spend analysis, organizations can bring clarity to the complexity of indirect spending. A case in point is another client of ours, a multinational corporation with offices around the globe. Their indirect spend was fragmented across multiple locations and departments, making it hard to track and control. With EmpoweringCPO’s comprehensive spend analysis services, they were able to centralize their indirect spending data, identify areas of overspending, and discover opportunities for consolidation and cost savings. This resulted in not only substantial cost reductions but also a more streamlined and efficient approach to managing their indirect spending.

In sum, while indirect spending may seem less glamorous than its direct counterpart, it carries significant weight. By applying rigorous spend analysis to indirect spending, organizations can uncover hidden opportunities for savings and efficiency, and optimize their operational expenditure. In the grand scheme of things, every penny counts, and indirect spending is no exception.

Section 3: The Differences between Direct and Indirect Spend Analysis

Although both direct and indirect spending are integral parts of an organization’s expenses, their analysis presents distinct challenges and opportunities due to their inherent differences. Let’s take a closer look.

Here’s a comparison table highlighting the key differences between direct and indirect spending analysis:

Direct SpendIndirect Spend
DefinitionExpenses directly associated with the production of goods or services.Expenses not directly linked to the production, but necessary for business operations.
ExamplesRaw materials, manufacturing equipment.Office supplies, utilities, IT services.
VisibilityHigh, often managed through a central procurement function.Lower, often managed by individual departments or locations.
Number of SuppliersGenerally fewer, as they are linked to specific products or services.Can be many, spread across a variety of categories.
Strategic FocusHigh, as it directly impacts the company’s core offerings.Often lower, due to its perceived non-strategic nature.
Potential for Cost SavingsAchieved through supplier negotiation, volume discounts, and alternative sourcing.Found in consolidating suppliers, leveraging company-wide buying power, and reducing maverick spend.
Direct Spend VS. Indirect Spend Comparison

While both types of spending present their own set of challenges, they also offer unique opportunities for cost savings and efficiency improvements.

Direct spend analysis, due to its direct link to a company’s products or services, often receives a high level of strategic focus. It provides opportunities for cost savings through better supplier negotiation, leveraging volume discounts, and exploring alternative sourcing strategies.

Indirect spending analysis, on the other hand, can often uncover hidden opportunities for savings. By consolidating suppliers, leveraging company-wide buying power, and reducing maverick spend (unplanned, uncontrolled purchases), organizations can significantly reduce their indirect spending.

The strategies for managing these two types of spend also differ. Direct spending is typically managed through a central procurement function, with a focus on strategic supplier relationships, contract negotiation, and demand planning. Indirect spending, due to its diverse nature, often requires a more decentralized approach, with individual departments or locations taking responsibility for their own spending categories. However, a centralized view through spending analysis can help bring visibility and control to this diverse spending.

In essence, recognizing and understanding these differences is the first step toward effectively managing both direct and indirect spending. With the right strategies and tools, like those provided by EmpoweringCPO, organizations can maximize their savings and efficiency in both areas.

Section 4: Why the Distinction Matters

Understanding the distinction between direct and indirect spending is more than just academic; it has profound implications for procurement strategy and the overall financial health of a business.

Without this distinction, organizations risk applying a one-size-fits-all approach to their procurement strategy. This can lead to missed opportunities for cost savings, inefficiencies, and a lack of control over spend. For instance, treating indirect spending with the same procurement processes used for direct spending might overlook the potential savings from supplier consolidation or company-wide buying power. Similarly, treating direct spending like indirect spending might fail to leverage strategic supplier relationships or volume discounts.

Conversely, understanding the difference between direct and indirect spending can lead to better procurement decisions and significant cost savings. It allows organizations to apply targeted strategies to each type of spend, maximizing the effectiveness of their procurement efforts. For example, an organization might decide to focus on strategic supplier relationships and contract negotiation for direct spending, while emphasizing supplier consolidation and reducing maverick spending for indirect spending.

Advanced tools and services, like those offered by EmpoweringCPO, play a pivotal role in effectively managing both types of spend. By providing comprehensive spend analysis services, we can help organizations dissect their direct and indirect spending in granular detail, uncover hidden opportunities for savings, and make data-driven procurement decisions. Our services can bring clarity to the complexity of spending data, provide actionable insights, and ultimately, drive procurement excellence.

In sum, the distinction between direct and indirect spending is far from trivial; it’s a critical aspect of effective spending management. By recognizing this distinction and leveraging the right tools and strategies, organizations can optimize their spending, enhance their procurement processes, and boost their bottom line. The power of spend analysis, when harnessed correctly, can indeed be transformative.

Section 5: How EmpoweringCPO Can Help

At EmpoweringCPO, we recognize the challenges and opportunities that both direct and indirect spending present. Our comprehensive suite of spend analysis services is designed to address these distinct needs, providing organizations with the insights they need to optimize their procurement strategies and make data-driven decisions.

Our spend analysis services encompass a range of offerings, including data collection, cleansing, classification, and analysis. We take a holistic approach, analyzing not just the numbers, but the underlying trends, patterns, and opportunities they reveal. Whether it’s identifying opportunities for supplier consolidation, uncovering potential savings from volume discounts, or spotting inefficiencies in procurement processes, our services provide the insights needed to transform spend management.

For direct spending, our services focus on optimizing the procurement of goods and services directly linked to a company’s products or services. We help organizations negotiate better terms with suppliers, take advantage of volume discounts, and explore alternative sourcing strategies. Through our in-depth analysis, organizations can gain a clear view of their direct spending, allowing them to make strategic decisions that enhance operational efficiency and drive cost savings.

For indirect spending, our services aim to bring clarity and control to the diverse range of expenses that support an organization’s operations. We help organizations centralize their indirect spending data, identify areas of overspending, and discover opportunities for consolidation and cost savings. By bringing visibility to indirect spending, we enable organizations to streamline their procurement processes, reduce maverick spend, and optimize their operational expenditure.

Don’t just take our word for it. Our clients attest to the value we bring to their organizations. One of our clients, a multinational corporation, was grappling with fragmented indirect spending across multiple locations and departments. With our comprehensive spend analysis services, they were able to centralize their spending data, uncover hidden opportunities for savings, and achieve significant cost reductions.

Another client, a leading manufacturer in the consumer electronics industry, was facing escalating costs of key components. Our in-depth direct spend analysis enabled them to consolidate their purchases, negotiate better prices with a single supplier, and drive substantial cost savings.

In essence, EmpoweringCPO is more than a provider of spend analysis services; we are a strategic partner, committed to empowering organizations to make better procurement decisions, optimize their spending, and drive operational excellence. With our advanced tools, expertise, and a client-first approach, we stand ready to help organizations navigate the complex landscape of direct and indirect spending, and unlock the full potential of spend analysis.

Conclusion

In the complex world of procurement, understanding the distinction between direct and indirect spending is not merely beneficial – it’s essential. These two categories of spend, each with its unique characteristics and challenges, significantly impact a company’s financial health and operational efficiency. Effective spend analysis, therefore, is not a luxury but a necessity for any organization seeking to optimize its procurement processes and improve its bottom line.

Direct spending, intrinsically tied to a company’s core products or services, requires strategic focus and diligent management. Indirect spending, while seemingly peripheral, can harbor hidden opportunities for savings and efficiency. The key to unlocking these opportunities lies in recognizing these differences, applying targeted strategies, and using advanced tools and services to dissect, analyze, and optimize spend.

At EmpoweringCPO, we’re committed to helping organizations navigate this journey. With our comprehensive suite of spend analysis services, we empower companies to transform their spending data into actionable insights, make data-driven procurement decisions, and achieve procurement excellence.

Whether you’re grappling with escalating direct spending costs, fragmented indirect spending, or simply want to gain a better understanding of your overall spending, we’re here to help. Explore our range of services, or get in touch with us to learn more about how we can empower your procurement processes. The journey towards effective spend management starts with a single step. Let EmpoweringCPO guide you on this path to success.

Share this Post
Direct vs Indirect Spend Analysis: What's the Difference and Why It Matters

EmpoweringCPO is a team of experienced sourcing and procurement professionals with hands on experience of having worked with many fortune 500 companies. The company was founded in 2011 and since then has executed multiple strategic sourcing projects and have achieved average savings of 10-12% so far. In addition to Strategic Sourcing their other offerings are Spend Analysis, Procurement Intelligence, Procurement Analytics, Best Cost Country Sourcing, Procurement Outsourcing, Built Operate Transfer, Supplier Diversity, Sustainable Procurement, Tail Spend Management, Item Master Optimization, Collective Buying, Compliance Tracking and Managed Procurement Services.

Get A Call Back

Introduction

In the fast-paced world of business, every decision counts, and every dollar matters. This is where the discipline of spend analysis comes into play. Spend analysis is the process of collecting, cleansing, classifying, and analyzing expenditure data with the purpose of reducing procurement costs, improving efficiency, and monitoring compliance. It’s a strategic pillar that underpins effective procurement and sourcing, providing an insightful lens through which organizations can view their spending patterns.

Spend analysis plays a vital role in procurement and strategic sourcing. It’s more than just knowing where the money goes; it’s about understanding the patterns, recognizing the opportunities for consolidation, and identifying the areas where procurement can negotiate better terms. By harnessing this data-driven insight, organizations can make strategic decisions that enhance operational efficiency, drive cost savings, and ultimately, deliver a competitive advantage.

In the realm of spend analysis, two terms often come to the fore: “direct spend” and “indirect spend”. These categories divide organizational expenditure into two broad camps, each with its unique characteristics, challenges, and opportunities. Understanding these terms is fundamental to unraveling the intricacies of spend management and leveraging the full potential of spend analysis.

In the journey that follows, we’ll delve into the nuances of direct and indirect spending, explore their differences, and illuminate why distinguishing between the two is not only important but instrumental in effective procurement strategy. So, whether you’re a seasoned procurement professional or a newcomer to the field, there’s something to discover and learn as we embark on this explorative discourse. Stay tuned!

Section 1: Understanding Direct Spend

Direct spending, as the name suggests, refers to the expenses directly associated with the production of goods or services that a company offers. These are the costs without which the creation of a product or service would simply be impossible. For instance, if you’re a car manufacturer, your direct spending would encompass the costs of materials like steel, rubber, and glass, which are integral to the production of vehicles. Similarly, a restaurant’s direct spending would include the cost of raw ingredients used to prepare the dishes on its menu.

These expenses are at the heart of a company’s operations, directly contributing to the core products or services it offers. They are often seen as the “cost of doing business”. Without these expenditures, production would halt, services would cease, and the company would be unable to fulfill its fundamental business purpose.

Spend analysis plays a crucial role in managing direct spending. By systematically analyzing direct spending data, organizations can identify trends, spot inefficiencies, and uncover opportunities for cost savings. This might involve negotiating better pricing with suppliers, consolidating purchases to take advantage of volume discounts, or switching to alternative materials or suppliers that offer better value for money.

Let’s take the example of one of our clients, a leading manufacturer in the consumer electronics industry. They were grappling with escalating costs of key components, which were eating into their profit margins. With the help of EmpoweringCPO’s spend analysis services, they were able to dissect their direct spending in granular detail. Our analysis revealed that they were sourcing similar components from multiple suppliers at varying prices. Armed with this insight, the company was able to consolidate its purchases and negotiate better prices with a single supplier, leading to significant cost savings and improved supplier relationship management. This instance showcases the potential of effective direct spend analysis in driving operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

In essence, understanding and managing direct spending is no easy task, but with diligent spend analysis, businesses can navigate this complex landscape more effectively. By making informed, data-driven decisions, they can optimize their direct spending and enhance their bottom line, all while ensuring the uninterrupted production of their core offerings.

Section 2: Understanding Indirect Spend

In contrast to direct spend, indirect spending refers to the expenses that are not directly linked to the production of a company’s goods or services, but are nonetheless vital for its operations. These costs cover a wide range of goods and services that support the organization’s functioning, such as office supplies, utilities, IT services, marketing expenses, and professional services.

While indirect spending may not contribute to a company’s products or services in the same way as direct spending, it significantly impacts a company’s operations and bottom line. These costs are essential for maintaining the infrastructure and environment that enable a company to operate effectively. For instance, without IT support, employees may not be able to perform their tasks efficiently. Without utilities like electricity and water, an office cannot function. So, while these costs may seem peripheral, they are fundamental to a company’s operational success and financial health.

Managing and analyzing indirect spending presents its own set of unique challenges. The broad range of categories and suppliers involved in indirect spending can make it difficult to track and control. It’s not uncommon for different departments or business units within an organization to independently manage their own indirect spending, leading to a lack of visibility and control at the organizational level. Additionally, because indirect spending is often viewed as non-strategic or less important, it may not receive the same level of scrutiny or strategic focus as direct spending.

However, with effective spend analysis, organizations can bring clarity to the complexity of indirect spending. A case in point is another client of ours, a multinational corporation with offices around the globe. Their indirect spend was fragmented across multiple locations and departments, making it hard to track and control. With EmpoweringCPO’s comprehensive spend analysis services, they were able to centralize their indirect spending data, identify areas of overspending, and discover opportunities for consolidation and cost savings. This resulted in not only substantial cost reductions but also a more streamlined and efficient approach to managing their indirect spending.

In sum, while indirect spending may seem less glamorous than its direct counterpart, it carries significant weight. By applying rigorous spend analysis to indirect spending, organizations can uncover hidden opportunities for savings and efficiency, and optimize their operational expenditure. In the grand scheme of things, every penny counts, and indirect spending is no exception.

Section 3: The Differences between Direct and Indirect Spend Analysis

Although both direct and indirect spending are integral parts of an organization’s expenses, their analysis presents distinct challenges and opportunities due to their inherent differences. Let’s take a closer look.

Here’s a comparison table highlighting the key differences between direct and indirect spending analysis:

Direct SpendIndirect Spend
DefinitionExpenses directly associated with the production of goods or services.Expenses not directly linked to the production, but necessary for business operations.
ExamplesRaw materials, manufacturing equipment.Office supplies, utilities, IT services.
VisibilityHigh, often managed through a central procurement function.Lower, often managed by individual departments or locations.
Number of SuppliersGenerally fewer, as they are linked to specific products or services.Can be many, spread across a variety of categories.
Strategic FocusHigh, as it directly impacts the company’s core offerings.Often lower, due to its perceived non-strategic nature.
Potential for Cost SavingsAchieved through supplier negotiation, volume discounts, and alternative sourcing.Found in consolidating suppliers, leveraging company-wide buying power, and reducing maverick spend.
Direct Spend VS. Indirect Spend Comparison

While both types of spending present their own set of challenges, they also offer unique opportunities for cost savings and efficiency improvements.

Direct spend analysis, due to its direct link to a company’s products or services, often receives a high level of strategic focus. It provides opportunities for cost savings through better supplier negotiation, leveraging volume discounts, and exploring alternative sourcing strategies.

Indirect spending analysis, on the other hand, can often uncover hidden opportunities for savings. By consolidating suppliers, leveraging company-wide buying power, and reducing maverick spend (unplanned, uncontrolled purchases), organizations can significantly reduce their indirect spending.

The strategies for managing these two types of spend also differ. Direct spending is typically managed through a central procurement function, with a focus on strategic supplier relationships, contract negotiation, and demand planning. Indirect spending, due to its diverse nature, often requires a more decentralized approach, with individual departments or locations taking responsibility for their own spending categories. However, a centralized view through spending analysis can help bring visibility and control to this diverse spending.

In essence, recognizing and understanding these differences is the first step toward effectively managing both direct and indirect spending. With the right strategies and tools, like those provided by EmpoweringCPO, organizations can maximize their savings and efficiency in both areas.

Section 4: Why the Distinction Matters

Understanding the distinction between direct and indirect spending is more than just academic; it has profound implications for procurement strategy and the overall financial health of a business.

Without this distinction, organizations risk applying a one-size-fits-all approach to their procurement strategy. This can lead to missed opportunities for cost savings, inefficiencies, and a lack of control over spend. For instance, treating indirect spending with the same procurement processes used for direct spending might overlook the potential savings from supplier consolidation or company-wide buying power. Similarly, treating direct spending like indirect spending might fail to leverage strategic supplier relationships or volume discounts.

Conversely, understanding the difference between direct and indirect spending can lead to better procurement decisions and significant cost savings. It allows organizations to apply targeted strategies to each type of spend, maximizing the effectiveness of their procurement efforts. For example, an organization might decide to focus on strategic supplier relationships and contract negotiation for direct spending, while emphasizing supplier consolidation and reducing maverick spending for indirect spending.

Advanced tools and services, like those offered by EmpoweringCPO, play a pivotal role in effectively managing both types of spend. By providing comprehensive spend analysis services, we can help organizations dissect their direct and indirect spending in granular detail, uncover hidden opportunities for savings, and make data-driven procurement decisions. Our services can bring clarity to the complexity of spending data, provide actionable insights, and ultimately, drive procurement excellence.

In sum, the distinction between direct and indirect spending is far from trivial; it’s a critical aspect of effective spending management. By recognizing this distinction and leveraging the right tools and strategies, organizations can optimize their spending, enhance their procurement processes, and boost their bottom line. The power of spend analysis, when harnessed correctly, can indeed be transformative.

Section 5: How EmpoweringCPO Can Help

At EmpoweringCPO, we recognize the challenges and opportunities that both direct and indirect spending present. Our comprehensive suite of spend analysis services is designed to address these distinct needs, providing organizations with the insights they need to optimize their procurement strategies and make data-driven decisions.

Our spend analysis services encompass a range of offerings, including data collection, cleansing, classification, and analysis. We take a holistic approach, analyzing not just the numbers, but the underlying trends, patterns, and opportunities they reveal. Whether it’s identifying opportunities for supplier consolidation, uncovering potential savings from volume discounts, or spotting inefficiencies in procurement processes, our services provide the insights needed to transform spend management.

For direct spending, our services focus on optimizing the procurement of goods and services directly linked to a company’s products or services. We help organizations negotiate better terms with suppliers, take advantage of volume discounts, and explore alternative sourcing strategies. Through our in-depth analysis, organizations can gain a clear view of their direct spending, allowing them to make strategic decisions that enhance operational efficiency and drive cost savings.

For indirect spending, our services aim to bring clarity and control to the diverse range of expenses that support an organization’s operations. We help organizations centralize their indirect spending data, identify areas of overspending, and discover opportunities for consolidation and cost savings. By bringing visibility to indirect spending, we enable organizations to streamline their procurement processes, reduce maverick spend, and optimize their operational expenditure.

Don’t just take our word for it. Our clients attest to the value we bring to their organizations. One of our clients, a multinational corporation, was grappling with fragmented indirect spending across multiple locations and departments. With our comprehensive spend analysis services, they were able to centralize their spending data, uncover hidden opportunities for savings, and achieve significant cost reductions.

Another client, a leading manufacturer in the consumer electronics industry, was facing escalating costs of key components. Our in-depth direct spend analysis enabled them to consolidate their purchases, negotiate better prices with a single supplier, and drive substantial cost savings.

In essence, EmpoweringCPO is more than a provider of spend analysis services; we are a strategic partner, committed to empowering organizations to make better procurement decisions, optimize their spending, and drive operational excellence. With our advanced tools, expertise, and a client-first approach, we stand ready to help organizations navigate the complex landscape of direct and indirect spending, and unlock the full potential of spend analysis.

Conclusion

In the complex world of procurement, understanding the distinction between direct and indirect spending is not merely beneficial – it’s essential. These two categories of spend, each with its unique characteristics and challenges, significantly impact a company’s financial health and operational efficiency. Effective spend analysis, therefore, is not a luxury but a necessity for any organization seeking to optimize its procurement processes and improve its bottom line.

Direct spending, intrinsically tied to a company’s core products or services, requires strategic focus and diligent management. Indirect spending, while seemingly peripheral, can harbor hidden opportunities for savings and efficiency. The key to unlocking these opportunities lies in recognizing these differences, applying targeted strategies, and using advanced tools and services to dissect, analyze, and optimize spend.

At EmpoweringCPO, we’re committed to helping organizations navigate this journey. With our comprehensive suite of spend analysis services, we empower companies to transform their spending data into actionable insights, make data-driven procurement decisions, and achieve procurement excellence.

Whether you’re grappling with escalating direct spending costs, fragmented indirect spending, or simply want to gain a better understanding of your overall spending, we’re here to help. Explore our range of services, or get in touch with us to learn more about how we can empower your procurement processes. The journey towards effective spend management starts with a single step. Let EmpoweringCPO guide you on this path to success.

Compliance Management Tool

Compliance management is very critical as otherwise the procurement organization may run into a scenario where there is a huge gap between realized savings and reported savings. Many procurement functions estimate large savings numbers when contracts are signed. They also invest significant time and effort in negotiating contracts for necessary goods and services, only to have a third or more of their purchasing dollars flow outside those deals. Some of the obvious fall-outs of non-compliance and maverick purchases are:

  • Very high prices
  • Risk of losing out on volume discounts and rebates

As compared to the current contract that was finalized after the sourcing process, the tool helps in tracking:

  • Vendor Compliance
  • Price Compliance

The objective of this tool is to ensure that the orders are placed only with the vendors that were shortlisted after the sourcing process and at the same price that was agreed upon and negotiated during and after the strategic sourcing process.

Request Tool Demo